Supreme Court Urged to Move Fast on Trump’s Ballot Eligibility – The New York Times
The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to review whether former President Trump can appear on Colorado’s ballot is deemed monumental for democracy, extending beyond the 2024 presidential election. The case stems from Colorado’s assertion that Trump engaged in insurrection, triggering a 14th Amendment provision preventing such individuals from holding office. The potential impact is rated a 10, marking a significant constitutional application since the Civil War, raising questions about a former president’s eligibility.
Legal scholar Derek Muller acknowledges the speculative nature of predicting the outcome, noting a chance for reversal. He underscores the risk for the court, emphasizing the binary choice with political consequences. The decision to consider only Trump’s appeal streamlines the process, minimizing complexity. Muller anticipates the court aiming for a comprehensive resolution to address ballot access questions in various states, with oral arguments scheduled for Feb. 8, 2024.
Muller submitted an amicus brief, asserting states’ power to judge presidential candidate qualifications but emphasizing their non-obligation to do so. He questioned Colorado’s jurisdiction, though the court disagreed. The period leading to the court’s decision raises uncertainties, with more states considering challenges as Super Tuesday approaches, creating voter ambiguity about Trump’s eligibility and potential impact on ballot validity.
#SupremeCourt #TrumpBallotDecision #DemocracyMatters #Election2024 #ConstitutionalChallenge